Handling Stalls and Excuses
Recognising common stalling tactics — and having a calm reply ready — keeps an account moving toward payment.
What you'll learn
- How to spot a genuine issue versus a stall
- Ready responses to common excuses
- How to convert a stall into a commitment
- When repeated stalls mean escalate
6 min read
Genuine issue or stall?
Not every delay is a dodge. A first-time query about an invoice detail, or an honest account of a temporary cash-flow problem, deserves a fair hearing and a sensible response. A stall, by contrast, is a tactic to buy time without committing — the vague promise, the perpetual unavailability, the excuse that shifts each time you call. The tell is the pattern: a genuine issue can be resolved and then the account moves; a stall recurs and never quite produces payment. Treat the first instance with good faith, but watch closely for the repetition that reveals avoidance.
Answers to the classics
Most excuses are familiar, and a calm, prepared reply keeps you in control:
- "The cheque is in the post." — "Great — what date did you send it, and for how much? If it hasn't cleared by Friday, can you pay electronically instead?"
- "I never received the invoice." — "No problem, I'll resend it now while we're on the call — can you confirm payment once it arrives?"
- "I have to check with my partner / accounts." — "Understood — when will you have an answer? I'll call you Thursday to confirm the date."
Each reply accepts the excuse at face value while closing the gap it was meant to open.
Turn a stall into a commitment
The antidote to a stall is specificity. Every excuse is an attempt to keep things vague, so your job is to replace vagueness with a named amount, a named day, and a named person. Whenever you accept a reason, immediately attach a concrete next step: a date you will call back, a deadline for the promised payment, a confirmation in writing. "Let's leave it there" is how stalls survive; "so you'll pay the amount by Tuesday, and I'll confirm by email" is how they end. Pin every soft answer to a hard commitment before the call closes.
When stalls become a pattern
Patience for stalls is not unlimited. When the same account produces a fresh excuse each time, breaks the commitments you pin down, or grows steadily harder to reach, you are no longer dealing with a payer who needs prompting — you are being managed. That pattern is a clear signal that internal follow-up has run its course and further chasing mostly wastes your time. A documented record of stalls and broken promises strengthens recovery. When excuses keep replacing payment, refer a debt rather than fielding another one.
Key takeaways
- Distinguish a one-off issue from a repeating stall.
- Have calm, prepared replies to the common excuses.
- Pin every soft answer to a specific commitment.
- A pattern of stalls is a clear signal to escalate.
Frequently asked questions
How do I tell a genuine reason from a stall?
By the pattern — a real issue resolves and the account moves; a stall recurs and never produces payment.
What do I say to "the cheque is in the post"?
Accept it, ask the date and amount, and set a fallback: electronic payment by a named day if it hasn't cleared.
When should repeated excuses trigger escalation?
When commitments keep breaking and the account grows harder to reach, further chasing rarely changes the outcome.
Knowledge is good. Getting paid is better.
Merion's team recovers what you're owed — commission-only, no upfront fee.